This calendar showcases SWIP-Analytic events and a number of talks within train distance of the New York City area given by women working in analytic philosophy. Email our webmaster at swipanalytic@gmail.com to suggest events to add to the calendar!

Loading Events

« All Events

  • This event has passed.

SWIP-Analytic 2015 Essay Prize Winner Presentation: Rebecca Traynor

April 20, 2015 @ 1:00 pm - 3:00 pm

TraynorPrize

Monday, April 20, 2015
1:00 – 3:00 PM

Rebecca Traynor, winner of the SWIP-Analytic 2015 Graduate Student Essay Prize, will present “Accurate Representation is Accurate Distortion” at SWIP-Analytic Monday, April 20, 2015. We encourage attendees to read the winning paper in advance of the presentation. Please email swipanalytic@gmail.com to request a copy.

ABSTRACT: Picasso’s ‘Woman Ironing’ captures the drudgery of ironing in virtue of depicting a woman so grey and emaciated she fails to correspond to the visual appearance of any actual woman. The painting distorts visual appearance in order to accurately represent a feature of the world—drudgery—for which we have no independent sense. I hypothesize that perception can similarly distort but accurately represent the external world. Orthodox accounts of representation split perceiving subjects from perceived objects; they take mental representation to represent the external world as it is in itself such that the former is transparent to the latter. But this means perceptual content is often in error. For example, researchers found that participants standing at the base of a hill while carrying a heavy backpack regularly overestimate steepness (Proffitt, et al. 1995). I argue that exaggerating steepness is accurate insofar as it corresponds to a relational feature of the world—arduousness—for which we have no independent sense. I argue that representational content admits of accurate distortions because accuracy is a matter of capturing relational facts about the world.

I argue artistic and mental representations admit of accurate distortions. However, distortions in artistic representation differ from those in mental representation because they aim at aesthetic goals. This means that the two cases admit of different functions. And it means that instances of artistic distortions are frequently—though not always—a result of conscious deliberation. I propose that when artists distort the external world, the choices they make exploit and thereby highlight cases of accurate distortion in mental representation. I hypothesize that cases of accurate distortion in art are parasitic on cases of accurate distortion in mental representation and that artistic skill is correlated with the ability to manipulate perceptual distortions.

 

 

Details

Date:
April 20, 2015
Time:
1:00 pm - 3:00 pm

Venue

NYU Philosophy Room 202
5 Washington Place
New York, NY United States
+ Google Map
css.php
Need help with the Commons? Visit our
help page
Send us a message
Skip to toolbar